MSI CUBI 1M-010BUS

MSI CUBI 1M-010BUS

MSI
47 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
MSI
12
HP
91
Developer
MSI
44
HP
87
Creator
MSI
20
HP
87
Home Office
MSI
42
HP
86
Workstation
MSI
40
HP
85
Business
MSI
41
HP
85
Ai Llm
MSI
19
HP
67
Compact
MSI
55
HP
32

Spezifikationen

MSI CUBI 1M-010BUSHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*Intel Core 5AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
15,270
30,931
Cores108
Frequency1.4 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache12 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Intel GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
3,170
28,703
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 1500 GB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU850W
Weight14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports22
USB Ports48
Thunderbolt2 x Thunderbolt0
HDMI2 x HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

MSI CUBI 1M-010BUS

  • Strong port (70th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (68th percentile)
  • Below average storage (24th percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 11 of 26 specs.

MSI CUBI 1M-010BUS Besser bei:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation