HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF Black/Silver 2016

HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF Black/Silver 2016

HP
39 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI Codex Z2 Codex Z2 A8NVM-485US Black 2025

MSI Codex Z2 Codex Z2 A8NVM-485US Black 2025

MSI
81 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Home Office
HP
38
MSI
80
Gaming
HP
7
MSI
75
Workstation
HP
28
MSI
71
Developer
HP
36
MSI
71
Creator
HP
12
MSI
71
Business
HP
48
MSI
70
Ai Llm
HP
15
MSI
46
Compact
HP
42
MSI
33

Spezifikationen

HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFFMSI Codex Z2 Codex Z2 A8NVM-485US
Processor
CPU*Intel Core I3-6100AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
4,097
30,931
Cores28
Frequency3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache3 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPUIntel HD Graphics 530NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
GPU Benchmark ScoreKeine Daten
20,712
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM8 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB16 GB
RAM GenerationDDR4DDR5
Storage 1256 GB2 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDNVMe SSD
Build
Form Factorsffmid-tower
PSU180W650W
Weight9.70 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports1
USB Ports88
HDMI1x HDMI
DisplayPort2 Display Port3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Wi-FiUSB Wi-Fi AdapterWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 10 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF Black/Silver 2016

  • Strong reliability (70th percentile)
  • Below average cpu (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average gpu (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average storage (13th percentile)13th %ile

MSI Codex Z2 Codex Z2 A8NVM-485US Black 2025

  • Strong storage (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong port selection (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong gpu (72nd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: MSI Codex Z2 Codex Z2 A8NVM-485US

Scores 81 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 15 of 25 specs.

HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF Besser bei:

Compact

MSI Codex Z2 Codex Z2 A8NVM-485US Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation