Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151

Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151

Intel
38 Gesamtbewertung
vs
SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5

SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5

SMC
80 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Productivity
Intel
37
SMC
94
Server
Intel
30
SMC
89
Ai Llm
Intel
29
SMC
85
Budget
Intel
65
SMC
41
Gaming
Intel
37
SMC
50
Efficiency
Intel
39
SMC
42

Spezifikationen

Intel Celeron G3900SMC EPYC 9555P
Processor
BrandIntelAMD
SeriesCeleronEPYC
ModelG39009555P
Codename—Turin
Classdesktopserver
Process—4★
Cores & Clocks
Cores264★
P-cores—64★
Threads
2
128
Base Clock
2,800
3,200
Boost ClockKeine Daten
4,400
Cache
L2 Cache0.564★
L3 CacheKeine Daten
256
Performance
PassMark Multi
2,157
123,576
PassMark Single
1,676
3,410
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4DDR5★
Max SpeedKeine Daten
6,000
ECC✓✓
Platform & Power
SocketLGA 1151AMD Socket SP5
PCIe—5.0
PCIe LanesKeine Daten
128
TDP51★360
Max Turbo Power—400★
Unlocked✗✗
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 510—

Vor- & Nachteile

Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA 1151

  • Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (69th percentile)
  • Below average ai (24th percentile)
  • Below average multi thread (27th percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (35th percentile)

SMC EPYC 9555P 64-core AMD Socket SP5

  • Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong platform (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (1st percentile)1st %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SMC EPYC 9555P

Scores 80 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 25 specs.

Intel Celeron G3900 Besser bei:

Budget

SMC EPYC 9555P Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity