FLATIC CDR2H
FLATIC
42 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Krlun
Krlun
31 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Product Photography
Youtube
Beginner
Video
Photography
Vlogging
Streaming
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Travel
Spezifikationen
| FLATIC CDR2H | Krlun | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CCD |
| Size | 1/3-inch | — |
| Megapixels | 64 MP★ | 48 MP |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 5K | 4K★ |
| Log Profile | ✓ | ✓ |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Articulating | ✓★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.78 kg | 0.15 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | — |
| USB | Type-C | Type C |
Vor- & Nachteile
FLATIC CDR2H
- Strong video (75th percentile)
- Strong sensor (74th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average af (31st percentile)
- Below average stabilization (31st percentile)
- Below average evf (34th percentile)
Krlun
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong sensor (65th percentile)
- Below average build (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average display (24th percentile)
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average af (31st percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: FLATIC CDR2H
Scores 42 overall, wins 9 of 10 usage categories and 3 of 9 specs.