FLATIC CDR2H

FLATIC CDR2H

FLATIC
43 Gesamtbewertung
vs
PUSOKEI B0FX568PPB Black

PUSOKEI B0FX568PPB Black

PUSOKEI
44 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Product Photography
FLATIC
55
PUSOKEI
63
Youtube
FLATIC
52
PUSOKEI
55
Beginner
FLATIC
52
PUSOKEI
45
Video
FLATIC
47
PUSOKEI
52
Photography
FLATIC
44
PUSOKEI
48
Streaming
FLATIC
43
PUSOKEI
46
Vlogging
FLATIC
43
PUSOKEI
43
Wedding Events
FLATIC
38
PUSOKEI
41
Sports Wildlife
FLATIC
30
PUSOKEI
30
Travel
FLATIC
28
PUSOKEI
28

Spezifikationen

FLATIC CDR2HPUSOKEI B0FX568PPB
Sensor
TypeCMOSCMOS
Size1/3-inchaps-h
Megapixels64 MP88 MP
ISO Range100
Video
Max Resolution5K8K
4K FPS60 fps
Log Profile
CodecH264
Display & EVF
Screen Size3"
Articulating
Build
Weight0.78 kg
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
USBType-CUSB2.0 (TYPE C) (High Speed)
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

FLATIC CDR2H

  • Strong sensor (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong video (79th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
  • Strong display (68th percentile)
  • Below average burst (32nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

PUSOKEI B0FX568PPB Black

  • Strong sensor (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong video (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (79th percentile)
  • Strong display (68th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (31st percentile)
  • Below average burst (32nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: PUSOKEI B0FX568PPB

Scores 44 overall, wins 6 of 10 usage categories and 6 of 14 specs.

FLATIC CDR2H Besser bei:

Beginner

PUSOKEI B0FX568PPB Besser bei:

VideoYoutubeStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsProduct Photography