Team Group T-FORCE G50 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Team Group
66 综合评分
vs
fanxiang S501 128GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
fanxiang
36 综合评分
买家怎么说
Team Group T-FORCE G50 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
82 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
这款SSD总体评价良好，用户称赞其速度、性价比以及在NAS和游戏配置中的表现。一些小缺点包括需要手动安装散热片，以及一些用户认为不必要的状态LED灯。总体而言，它被认为是日常用户和爱好者可靠且经济实惠的选择。
优点
- 读写速度快
- 性价比高
- 在NAS中运行良好
- 安装简便
- 性能可靠
缺点
- 手动安装散热片
- 不必要的状态LED
- 速度非顶级
Speed 4
Value for money 3
Ease of installation 2
Build quality 2
Thermal management 2
Led indicator 1
fanxiang S501 128GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
78 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
大多数用户对这款经济型NVMe固态硬盘非常满意，称赞其速度、安装简便和极高的性价比。有人提到它适合维修或升级，还有用户表示已稳定运行一年多。然而，一位已验证买家收到了有缺陷的硬盘，处于只读模式且完全无法使用，这是一个值得关注的问题。
优点
- 速度快
- 安装简便
- 性价比高
- 适合维修
- 长期可靠
缺点
- 开箱即坏
- 只读模式故障
- 品牌可靠性担忧
Value for money 5
Speed 4
Ease of installation 4
Reliability 3
Defective unit 1
Suitability for repairs 2
评分
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Gaming
Console
Portable
规格
| Team Group T-FORCE G50 | fanxiang S501 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4★ | 3 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✗ |
| Controller | InnoGrit | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | 无数据 | |
| MTBF (hours) | 无数据 | |
| Warranty (years) | 3★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | — |
| Hardware Encryption | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Team Group T-FORCE G50 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong endurance (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong feature (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
- Strong affordability (76th percentile)
- Below average capacity (35th percentile)
fanxiang S501 128GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong affordability (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (79th percentile)
- Below average capacity (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile
结论
胜出: Team Group T-FORCE G50
Scores 66 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 16 specs.