Ritek A801 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Ritek
52 综合评分
vs
Corsair MP700 Elite 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Corsair
87 综合评分
买家怎么说
Ritek A801 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
暂无用户反馈
Corsair MP700 Elite 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
88 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
Corsair MP700 Elite 因其卓越的速度而广受赞誉，读取速度超过 10,000 MB/s，并能流畅处理 8K 视频编辑等繁重工作负载。一些用户指出它会发热，需要良好的散热器或主动冷却，而另一些用户则认为其温度可接受，尤其是与其他 Gen 5 SSD 相比。总体而言，它被认为是一款高性能、可靠的 SSD，物有所值，尽管有些人提到它并未达到 Gen 5 速度的绝对顶峰。
优点
- 卓越的读取速度
- 处理繁重工作负载
- 安装简便
- 物有所值
- 在适当冷却下运行温度合理
缺点
- 无冷却时发热
- 需要散热器或主动冷却
- 不是最快的 Gen 5 SSD
Performance 8
Temperature 6
Value for money 4
Ease of installation 3
Reliability 3
Cooling requirement 3
评分
Budget
Laptop
Gaming
Console
Workstation
Portable
规格
| Ritek A801 | Corsair MP700 Elite | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 | 5★ |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✗ |
| Controller | — | PS5031-E31T |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | 无数据 | |
| MTBF (hours) | 无数据 | |
| Warranty (years) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware Encryption | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Ritek A801 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong affordability (78th percentile)
- Strong speed (66th percentile)
- Below average capacity (27th percentile)
Corsair MP700 Elite 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong endurance (88th percentile)88th %ile
价格
Ritek A801 500GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Corsair MP700 Elite 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
No current pricing available
结论
胜出: Corsair MP700 Elite
Scores 87 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.
