Netac Shadow III 32GB DDR4-3200
Netac
67 综合评分
vs
Corsair Vengeance RGB 64GB DDR5-6400
Corsair
92 综合评分
买家怎么说
Netac Shadow III 32GB DDR4-3200
暂无用户反馈
Corsair Vengeance RGB 64GB DDR5-6400
72 满分 100 置信度中 14 条评价
用户普遍报告在AMD系统上EXPO/XMP配置文件性能良好，并欣赏其美观和稳定性。然而，出现了一些关于兼容性（Hynix Die-M vs Die-A）和Corsair iCUE软件复杂性的担忧。总体而言，大多数买家满意，但有些人警告特定硬件版本和软件问题。
优点
- 稳定的EXPO/XMP配置文件
- 6000 MHz下性能良好
- 美观的RGB灯效
- 安装简便
- 与AMD系统兼容性好
缺点
- iCUE软件复杂
- 与Hynix Die-M的兼容性问题
- 某些主板不在QVL列表中
- 4条内存可能存在问题
Performance 5
Compatibility 4
Software 2
Aesthetics 3
Installation 2
Value for money 1
评分
Gaming
Workstation
Budget
Laptop
Server
规格
| Netac Shadow III | Corsair Vengeance RGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16★ | 32 |
| Timings | — | 32-40-40-84 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858★ | 1.399999976158142 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | Intel XMP 3.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
优缺点
Netac Shadow III 32GB DDR4-3200
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
Corsair Vengeance RGB 64GB DDR5-6400
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
价格
Netac Shadow III 32GB DDR4-32000.334每美元得分
vs
Corsair Vengeance RGB 64GB DDR5-64000.071每美元得分
Netac Shadow III 32GB DDR4-3200 性价比高 4.7 倍
结论
胜出: Corsair Vengeance RGB
Scores 92 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 15 specs.
