Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27" Black 2025
Gigabyte
92 综合评分
vs
ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 2026
ASUS
79 综合评分
评分
Gaming
Office
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
规格
| Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27" | ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz | 360 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-Sync★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 600 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 98%/ 135% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | 8-bit |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR 600 |
| HDR Support | HDR400 | HDR600 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 3★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1★ | 0 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Power | 45W★ | — |
| Weight | 7.11 kg★ | 8.40 kg |
优缺点
Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27" Black 2025
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 2026
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong performance (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong connectivity (78th percentile)
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (28th percentile)
价格
Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27" Black 20250.145每美元得分
vs
ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 20260.086每美元得分
Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27" Black 2025 性价比高 1.7 倍
Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27" Black 2025
ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQN 27" 2026
结论
胜出: Gigabyte M Series OLED MO27U2 SA 27"
Scores 92 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 28 specs.
