Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
Meike
83 综合评分
vs
AstrHori 6.5mm F2.0 6mm
AstrHori
49 综合评分
买家怎么说
Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
暂无用户反馈
AstrHori 6.5mm F2.0 6mm
72 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
这款手动鱼眼镜头提供独特的圆形图像和强烈的畸变，许多用户喜欢它用于创意拍摄，如滑板视频和旅行照片。做工质量因价格而受到称赞，但在佳能无反和全画幅相机上的兼容性问题是一个明显的缺点。由于仅手动设计和在宽光圈下景深较浅，对焦很棘手。总的来说，对于了解其局限性的人来说，这是一个有趣且价格合理的镜头。
优点
- 价格合理的坚固做工质量
- 有趣的创意鱼眼效果
- 紧凑便携
- 物有所值
- 中心图像清晰
缺点
- 仅手动对焦，使用棘手
- 与佳能无反相机的兼容性问题
- 在全画幅相机上图像圈小
- 无自动对焦
- 无法使用镜头滤镜
Build quality 4
Value for money 5
Manual focus difficulty 4
Compatibility issues 3
Image circle size 2
Creative effect 4
评分
Portrait
Street
Macro
Video Cinema
Budget
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
规格
| Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm | AstrHori 6.5mm F2.0 6mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | fisheye |
| Focal Length Min | 56 mm | 6 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 56 mm | 6 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 6 |
| Groups | 7 | 5 |
| ED Elements | 2★ | — |
| Coating | Multi-layer coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.7 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.7 | f/2 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.19 kg★ | 0.27 kg |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 56 mm★ | 200 mm |
优缺点
Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
- Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
AstrHori 6.5mm F2.0 6mm
- Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong aperture (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong macro (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Below average optical (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
价格
Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
AstrHori 6.5mm F2.0 6mm
No current pricing available
结论
胜出: Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
Scores 83 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 17 specs.
