Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
Meike
83 综合评分
vs
TTArtisan APS-C 25mm f/2 25mm
TTArtisan
45 综合评分
买家怎么说
Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
暂无用户反馈
TTArtisan APS-C 25mm f/2 25mm
85 满分 100 置信度中 18 条评价
TTArtisan 25mm f/2镜头因其出色的性价比、紧凑的尺寸和坚固的做工而广受好评。用户强调其锐度、明亮光圈和手动对焦能力，使其成为学习摄影或街头摄影的理想选择。一些人注意到眩光和螺纹镜头盖等小问题，但总体而言，它以这个价格提供了令人印象深刻的性能。
优点
- 出色的性价比
- 紧凑轻便
- 做工扎实
- 图像锐利
- 明亮的f/2光圈
缺点
- 无自动对焦
- 无EXIF数据
- 螺纹镜头盖
- 有些眩光
- 非完全饼干头
Value for money 5
Build quality 4
Image quality 4
Size and weight 3
Manual focus 3
Flaring 2
评分
Portrait
Street
Macro
Video Cinema
Budget
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
规格
| Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm | TTArtisan APS-C 25mm f/2 25mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 56 mm | 25 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 56 mm | 25 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 7 |
| Groups | 7 | 5 |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Coating | Multi-layer coatings | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.7 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.7 | f/2 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.19 kg★ | 0.31 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 56 mm★ | 250 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4★ |
优缺点
Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
- Strong aperture (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong macro (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
TTArtisan APS-C 25mm f/2 25mm
- Strong macro (77th percentile)
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Strong build (72nd percentile)
- Below average optical (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
价格
Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm0.528每美元得分
vs
TTArtisan APS-C 25mm f/2 25mm0.806每美元得分
TTArtisan APS-C 25mm f/2 25mm 性价比高 1.5 倍
结论
胜出: Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
Scores 83 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 20 specs.
