Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
Meike
83 综合评分
vs
Yongnuo YN 50mm f/1.8 II 50mm
Yongnuo
55 综合评分
买家怎么说
Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
暂无用户反馈
Yongnuo YN 50mm f/1.8 II 50mm
78 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
这款50mm f/1.8镜头被广泛认为是初学者和爱好者的超值选择。用户称赞其前景对焦清晰、背景虚化效果佳，非常适合人像和产品拍摄。虽然做工感觉廉价，自动对焦噪音大且速度慢，但大多数用户认为其光学性能远超其低廉的价格。有少数用户提到了耐用性问题以及与新型遮光罩不兼容的情况。
优点
- 超值性价比
- 前景对焦清晰
- 令人满意的虚化效果
- 人像拍摄出色
- 轻便紧凑
缺点
- 自动对焦噪音大
- 自动对焦速度慢
- 做工廉价
- 耐用性存疑
- 与新型遮光罩不兼容
Value for money 6
Bokeh and image quality 6
Autofocus speed 4
Autofocus noise 3
Build quality 4
Beginner friendly 5
评分
Portrait
Street
Macro
Video Cinema
Budget
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
规格
| Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm | Yongnuo YN 50mm f/1.8 II 50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 56 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 56 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 8 |
| Groups | 7 | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 1 |
| Coating | Multi-layer coatings | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.7 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.19 kg | 0.16 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 58 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 56 mm★ | 450 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:6.67★ |
优缺点
Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
- Strong aperture (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong macro (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Yongnuo YN 50mm f/1.8 II 50mm
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
价格
Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm0.528每美元得分
vs
Yongnuo YN 50mm f/1.8 II 50mm0.445每美元得分
Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm 性价比高 1.2 倍
结论
胜出: Meike 56mm F1.7 56mm
Scores 83 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.
