OM System M.Zuiko MC-20
OM System
65 综合评分
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
84 综合评分
评分
Street
Travel
Budget
Portrait
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Macro
Landscape
规格
| OM System M.Zuiko MC-20 | Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | — | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | — | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.15 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | PZ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 150 mm★ | 249 mm |
| Max Magnification | 2.0x★ | 0.215x |
优缺点
OM System M.Zuiko MC-20
- Strong macro (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong stabilization (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong aperture (74th percentile)
- Below average optical (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average social proof (33th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
价格
OM System M.Zuiko MC-200.167每美元得分
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm0.606每美元得分
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm 性价比高 3.6 倍
OM System M.Zuiko MC-20
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
结论
胜出: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 84 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
