Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
Sony
90 综合评分
vs
Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm
Canon
47 综合评分
买家怎么说
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
85 满分 100 置信度中 22 条评价
索尼 DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM 镜头是套机18-55mm镜头的显著升级，提供恒定快速光圈、安静自动对焦和卓越画质。用户称赞其锐度、虚化和做工，但指出它更重、体积更大。少数翻新机有轻微划痕或早期故障，但总体而言，该镜头强烈推荐用于索尼 Alpha APS-C 相机。
优点
- 恒定F2.8光圈
- 快速静音自动对焦
- 出色的图像锐度和对比度
- 令人愉悦的虚化效果
- 坚固的做工质量
缺点
- 沉重且笨重
- 部分设备有早期故障
- 不兼容全画幅相机
- 中等眩光问题
- 变焦范围限制在50mm
Image quality 9
Build quality 8
Autofocus performance 5
Weight and size 6
Value for money 4
Refurbished condition 6
Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm
45 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
佳能RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM双鱼眼镜头收到褒贬不一的评价。一位已验证用户报告了一个严重的自动对焦错误，需要重置相机才能修复，并且与佳能VR Utility不兼容。另一位已验证用户认为它是R5系统的一个价格实惠、轻便且带自动对焦的替代品。第三位未验证用户称赞其用于VR视频，称其为婚礼摄像的10/10购买。
优点
- R5设置的经济实惠替代品
- 轻量化设计
- 自动对焦功能
- 非常适合VR视频
- 适合婚礼摄像
缺点
- 频繁丢失自动对焦，需要重置相机
- 与佳能VR Utility不兼容
- 兼容性有限（仅确认R7）
- 没有旋入式ND滤镜选项
- 仅对左镜头主体自动对焦
Autofocus reliability 3
Compatibility 3
Value for money 2
Vr video quality 2
Build quality 1
Filter options 2
评分
Travel
Budget
Street
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Portrait
Professional
Macro
规格
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm | Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | fisheye |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 4 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 4 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 11 |
| Groups | 8 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Air Sphere Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | f/3.5 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon RF |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 0.29 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 31 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 201 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x | 1:33.33★ |
优缺点
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average social proof (26th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
价格
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm0.657每美元得分
vs
Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm0.038每美元得分
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm 性价比高 17.3 倍
结论
胜出: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
