Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm
Olympus
51 综合评分
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
99 综合评分
评分
Video Cinema
Budget
Professional
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Travel
Street
Wildlife Sports
规格
| Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 12 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 12 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 16 |
| Groups | 8 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| Coating | ZERO Coating | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.13 kg★ | 0.54 kg |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | MSC | RXD |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 200 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.08x | 1:4.8★ |
优缺点
Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong optical (71st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
价格
Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm0.075每美元得分
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.159每美元得分
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 性价比高 2.1 倍
Olympus M.Zuiko 12mm f/2 35mm
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
结论
胜出: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 99 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
