Meze 99 Classics M99C-V2
Meze
34 综合评分
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Beyerdynamic
84 综合评分
买家怎么说
Meze 99 Classics M99C-V2
65 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
Meze 99 Classics V2 收到了褒贬不一的评价。许多人称赞其惊艳的设计、温暖且引人入胜的声音（具有冲击力的低音）以及自调节头梁带来的舒适佩戴感。然而，一些用户报告了因贴合度导致的低音不一致、头梁的麦克风噪音、热量积聚以及需要均衡器才能获得最佳音质的问题，导致部分用户退货并选择 Fiio FT1 等替代品。
优点
- 惊艳的设计
- 温暖且引人入胜的声音
- 有力的低音，中高频表现良好
- 自调节头梁，佩戴舒适
- 16欧姆易于驱动
缺点
- 因贴合度导致的低音不一致
- 头梁的麦克风噪音
- 长时间使用时的热量积聚
- 耳罩较小，不适合大耳朵
- 需要均衡器才能获得最佳音质
Design aesthetics 8
Sound quality 9
Bass performance 6
Comfort fit 7
Build quality 5
Value for money 4
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
暂无用户反馈
评分
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
规格
| Meze 99 Classics M99C-V2 | Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.26 kg | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | vegan leather | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | vegan leather | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 15 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 25 kHz★ | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 0.30480000376701355 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✓★ | ✗ |
优缺点
Meze 99 Classics M99C-V2
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Strong sound (75th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
价格
Meze 99 Classics M99C-V20.113每美元得分
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1000.498每美元得分
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 性价比高 4.4 倍
结论
胜出: Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 41 specs.
