Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T027
Skullcandy
73 综合评分
vs
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 1224002
Bang & Olufsen
78 综合评分
买家怎么说
Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T027
72 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC 收到了褒贬不一的反馈。许多用户称赞其均衡器调整后的出色音质、坚固的构造、长电池续航以及适合中等头型的舒适佩戴感。然而，几位经过验证的评论者报告称，对于大头型用户存在严重不适、默认声音浑浊、降噪效果不如旧款型号以及缺乏低音。该产品根据头型大小和声音期望而产生了强烈的意见分歧。
优点
- 均衡器调整后音质出色
- 电池续航长
- 构造坚固
- 适合中等头型
- 对某些人降噪效果好
缺点
- 大头型佩戴不适
- 默认声音浑浊
- 对某些人降噪效果弱
- 缺乏低音
- 充电时不会自动关机
Sound quality 10
Comfort 6
Noise cancellation 7
Battery life 4
Build quality 5
Bass performance 5
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 1224002
85 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 耳机因其卓越的音质、优质材料和出色的舒适度而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户称赞其自然、平衡的声音特性和有效的降噪功能，尽管有些人注意到价格较高和轻微的连接问题。一些评论将其与 Sennheiser Momentum 4 和 Focal 等竞争对手进行有利比较，强调其卓越的制造工艺和声音中性。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 优质材料和做工
- 长时间佩戴的出色舒适度
- 有效的降噪功能
- 长电池续航
缺点
- 价格高昂
- 没有D/A转换器
- 对某些人来说中频不足
- 与Windows音量控制的连接问题
- 默认声音模式最初不吸引人
Sound quality 8
Build quality 6
Comfort 5
Noise cancellation 5
Battery life 4
Value for money 4
评分
Budget
Gaming
Work
Music
Commute
Calls
Studio
规格
| Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T027 | Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 1224002 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.29 kg | 0.28 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | memory foam | memory foam |
| Headband | — | aluminium |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 22 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 36 Ω | 24 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 119.4000015258789 dB★ | 95 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC Wireless Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones, THX Spatial Audio with Head Tracking, Adaptive Noise Cancelling, Up to 60 Hours Battery, Microphone for iPhone Android - Tortoise | AAC, aptX Adaptive, SBC |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Adaptive | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.1 |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Cable Length | — | 1.2000000476837158 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 60 hrs★ | 40 hrs |
| Charge Time | 0.1666666716337204 hrs★ | 3 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 10 Minute Charge = 4 Hours Playtime | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | — | 1,200 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | 4 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | Skullcandy App | — |
| Water Resistance | Water-Resistant | IP53 |
优缺点
Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T027
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong battery (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong mic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 1224002
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong connectivity (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average build (35th percentile)
价格
Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T0270.428每美元得分
vs
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 12240020.142每美元得分
Skullcandy Aviator S6AVW-T027 性价比高 3.0 倍
结论
胜出: Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 1224002
Scores 78 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 36 specs.
