ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt 16GB GDDR7 Black
ASUS
97 综合评分
vs
PNY RTX 2000 Ada Quadro RTX 16GB GDDR6 workstation
PNY
50 综合评分
选择ASUS GeForce RTX，如果...
Pick the ASUS if you want a 4K gaming monster or a serious creative workhorse, and you have the budget and case space for it.
选择PNY RTX 2000，如果...
Pick the PNY if you need a low-profile, power-efficient workstation card for CAD, video editing, or AI inference in a small form factor build where the Quadro driver certification matters more than raw speed.
主要区别
- Raw compute is a bloodbath: the ASUS packs 10,752 CUDA cores, 336 tensor cores, and 84 RT cores vs the PNY's 2,816, 88, and 22. FP32 throughput is 56.3 TFLOPS vs 12.
- Memory bandwidth tells the same story: 960 GB/s on a 256-bit GDDR7 bus vs 256 GB/s on a 128-bit GDDR6 bus. That's nearly 4x the data throughput for the ASUS.
- Gaming scores are night and day: 99 vs 33 at 4K, 99 vs 38 at 1440p, and 99 vs 41 at 1080p. The PNY isn't a gaming card, period.
- The PNY has one spec win: a 2,816 MHz boost clock vs the ASUS's 2,730 MHz. But with a fraction of the cores, that higher clock doesn't translate to real-world performance.
- Price and size: the PNY is a compact single-slot card built for workstations, while ASUS owners consistently mention the 5080's large size requires a spacious case. The ASUS also costs significantly more, and one user reported a dead-on-arrival unit.
买家怎么说
ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt 16GB GDDR7 Black
78 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5080 因其原始性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在4K游戏中，许多用户指出它可以轻松处理要求苛刻的游戏。超频潜力令人印象深刻，一位用户在保持67-68°C低温的同时实现了3.3 GHz的升频。然而，高昂的价格是一个反复出现的问题，并且有一块卡到货时无法使用，需要更换。总体而言，推荐给有预算的人，特别是从RTX 3090或更早的旧世代升级的用户。
优点
- 出色的4K游戏性能
- 令人印象深刻的超频潜力
- 负载下低温运行（67-68°C）
- 与高端型号相比性价比高
- 坚固的制造质量
缺点
- 价格高昂
- 有一块到货时无法使用
- 尺寸大需要宽敞的机箱
- 对于1080p游戏不划算
4k gaming performance 5
Overclocking potential 2
Thermal performance 2
Price value 4
Build quality 2
Reliability defects 1
PNY RTX 2000 Ada Quadro RTX 16GB GDDR6 workstation
暂无用户反馈
评分
Gaming 1440p
Gaming 1080p
Gaming 4k
Ray Tracing
Content Creation
Budget
Workstation
Ai Llm
规格
| ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt | PNY RTX 2000 Ada Quadro RTX | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | GeForce RTX 5080 | RTX 2000 Ada |
| Brand | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Blackwell | Turing |
| Class | consumer | workstation |
| Process | 5 | 5 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7★ | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| Compute | ||
| CUDA Cores | ||
| Tensor Cores | ||
| RT Cores | 84★ | 22 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 56.279998779296875★ | 12 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 56.279998779296875★ | 12 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 360 | 70★ |
| Recommended PSU | 850 | 250★ |
| Power Connectors | 1x 16-Pin PCI Connector | — |
| Cooler | Triple Fan★ | — |
| Fans | 3★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 5.0 x16 | — |
| DisplayPort | 2★ | 1 |
| HDMI | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1★ | — |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 | — |
| Physical | ||
| Length | 304★ | — |
| Slot Width | 2.5 | 2★ |
| Form Factor | Full Height | — |
| Weight | 2.09 kg | 0.55 kg★ |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Upscaling | DLSS 4 | — |
| AV1 Encode | ✓ | ✓ |
| VR Ready | ✓★ | — |
| DirectX | 12 | — |
| RGB | ✓★ | — |
优缺点
ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt 16GB GDDR7 Black
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong rt (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average affordability (17th percentile)17th %ile
PNY RTX 2000 Ada Quadro RTX 16GB GDDR6 workstation
- Strong efficiency (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong ai (67th percentile)
- Strong vram (67th percentile)
- Below average thermal (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average compute (31st percentile)
价格
ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt 16GB GDDR7 Black0.034每美元得分
vs
PNY RTX 2000 Ada Quadro RTX 16GB GDDR6 workstation0.052每美元得分
PNY RTX 2000 Ada Quadro RTX 16GB GDDR6 workstation 性价比高 1.5 倍
结论
胜出: ASUS GeForce RTX 5080 ProArt
Scores 97 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 18 of 39 specs.
