Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 综合评分
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA 2011
Intel
49 综合评分
买家怎么说
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
暂无用户反馈
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA 2011
80 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
Intel Xeon E5-2697 因其高性能而广受好评，尤其是在模拟、数学分析和服务器工作负载等要求苛刻的任务中。用户强调其12个核心以及相对于购买新电脑而言的成本效益。然而，也有个别报告称其某些用途下速度较慢，兼容性问题导致无法使用（可能是工程样品），以及有建议认为两款较旧的Xeon可以以更低成本提供类似性能。
评分
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
规格
| Thermal Grizzly 000 | Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | — | Xeon |
| Model | 000 | E5-2697 v2 |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 12★ |
| Threads | — | 24★ |
| Base Clock | 无数据 | |
| Boost Clock | 无数据 | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 3★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 30★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 无数据 | |
| PassMark Single | 无数据 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR3★ |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA 2011 |
| TDP | — | 130★ |
优缺点
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA 2011
- Strong multi thread (68th percentile)
- Strong ai (67th percentile)
- Below average social proof (23rd percentile)
- Below average affordability (25th percentile)
价格
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM50.626每美元得分
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 12-core LGA 20110.121每美元得分
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5 性价比高 5.2 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Scores 49 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 17 specs.
