Anker SoloCam T8170

Anker SoloCam T8170

Anker
31 综合评分
vs
Nikon Z Z9 Black 2021

Nikon Z Z9 Black 2021

Nikon
100 综合评分

评分

Beginner
Anker
32
Nikon
97
Video
Anker
24
Nikon
95
Wedding Events
Anker
26
Nikon
95
Sports Wildlife
Anker
29
Nikon
94
Photography
Anker
22
Nikon
91
Youtube
Anker
19
Nikon
90
Product Photography
Anker
20
Nikon
88
Travel
Anker
30
Nikon
81
Streaming
Anker
26
Nikon
76
Vlogging
Anker
16
Nikon
76

规格

Anker SoloCam T8170Nikon Z Z9
Sensor
Type—Stacked CMOS
Size1/2.3-inchfull-frame
Megapixels3 MP45.70000076293945 MP★
ISO Range—64★
Processor—EXPEED 7
Autofocus
AF Points无数据
493
AF Type—Phase Detection: 493
Eye AF—✓★
Animal AF—✓★
Subject Detection—✓★
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)—30 fps★
Burst (Electronic)—120 fps★
Max Shutter—1/32000
Electronic Shutter—✓★
Video
Max Resolution—8K★
4K FPS—120 fps★
1080p FPS—100 fps★
10-bit—✓★
Log Profile—✓★
RAW Video—✓★
Codec—ProRes 422 HQ, H.265
Display & EVF
Screen Size—3.2"★
Touchscreen✗✓★
Articulating—✓★
EVF Resolution—3.7M dots★
Build
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.63 kg★1.16 kg
Battery Life—700 shots★
Connectivity
Wi-Fi✓✓
Bluetooth✗✓★
USB—USB-C★
HDMI—HDMI Output
Hot Shoe✗✓★

优缺点

Anker SoloCam T8170

  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average video (24th percentile)
  • Below average display (31st percentile)
  • Below average burst (34th percentile)

Nikon Z Z9 Black 2021

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong video (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile

价格

Anker SoloCam T8170 is £2,836 cheaper (12.6x less).

Anker SoloCam T81700.125每美元得分
vs
Nikon Z Z9 Black 20210.032每美元得分

Anker SoloCam T8170 性价比高 3.9 倍

Anker SoloCam T8170

Nikon Z Z9 Black 2021

结论

★ 胜出: Nikon Z Z9

Scores 100 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 23 of 33 specs.

Nikon Z Z9 更擅长:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

也值得考虑