G.Skill F3-10600CL9D-8GBNT
G.Skill
32 Pontuação geral
vs
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A
Crucial
61 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Especificações
| G.Skill F3-10600CL9D-8GBNT | Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 240 | 288 |
| Rank | — | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 9★ | 22 |
| Timings | 9-9-9-24 | 22-22-22 |
| Voltage | 1.5 | 1.2000000476837158★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | — | ✗ |
Prós e Contras
G.Skill F3-10600CL9D-8GBNT
- Strong latency (67th percentile)
- Below average speed (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
- Below average social proof (35th percentile)
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Preços
G.Skill F3-10600CL9D-8GBNT0.335pontos por dólar
vs
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A0.482pontos por dólar
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A oferece 1.4x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A
Scores 61 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.
