Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Pontuação geral
vs
Trioplan 35mm f/2.8 II 35mm

Trioplan 35mm f/2.8 II 35mm

Meyer-Optik Görlitz
67 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Professional
Sigma
86
Meyer-Optik Görlitz
48
Street
Sigma
86
Meyer-Optik Görlitz
58
Macro
Sigma
82
Meyer-Optik Görlitz
59
Portrait
Sigma
81
Meyer-Optik Görlitz
69
Travel
Sigma
80
Meyer-Optik Görlitz
36
Budget
Sigma
75
Meyer-Optik Görlitz
54
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Meyer-Optik Görlitz
48
Landscape
Sigma
71
Meyer-Optik Görlitz
30
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Meyer-Optik Görlitz
43

Especificações

Sigma 207975Trioplan 35mm f/2.8 II 35mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoom
Focal Length Min10 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm35 mm
Elements13
Groups10
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/22
Constant
Diaphragm Blades712
Build
MountSony EMicro Four Thirds
FormatAPS-CMicro Four Thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.30 kg
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm200 mm
Max Magnification1:4

Prós e Contras

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Trioplan 35mm f/2.8 II 35mm

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Preços

Trioplan 35mm f/2.8 II 35mm

No current pricing available

Veredito

Vencedor: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Considere também