Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Pontuação geral
vs
Ultimaxx UM-ZL650W4 650-1300mm

Ultimaxx UM-ZL650W4 650-1300mm

Ultimaxx
34 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Professional
Sigma
98
Ultimaxx
41
Portrait
Sigma
90
Ultimaxx
42
Street
Sigma
88
Ultimaxx
48
Budget
Sigma
85
Ultimaxx
37
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Ultimaxx
41
Macro
Sigma
83
Ultimaxx
14
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Ultimaxx
39
Landscape
Sigma
77
Ultimaxx
29
Travel
Sigma
75
Ultimaxx
44

Especificações

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmUltimaxx UM-ZL650W4 650-1300mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm650 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm1300 mm
Elements16
Groups11
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.14 kg
Filter Thread72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Prós e Contras

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Ultimaxx UM-ZL650W4 650-1300mm

  • Strong build (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Veredito

Vencedor: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports