HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Pontuação geral
vs
ACEMAGIC Retro X3

ACEMAGIC Retro X3

ACEMAGIC
70 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Gaming
HP
91
ACEMAGIC
16
Creator
HP
87
ACEMAGIC
27
Developer
HP
87
ACEMAGIC
68
Home Office
HP
87
ACEMAGIC
69
Business
HP
87
ACEMAGIC
64
Workstation
HP
86
ACEMAGIC
56
Compact
HP
30
ACEMAGIC
71
Ai Llm
HP
67
ACEMAGIC
27

Especificações

HP OMEN GT16-0364ACEMAGIC Retro X3
Processor
CPUAMD Ryzen 7 8700F★AMD Ryzen 7
CPU Multi-Core Score
30,931
Sem dados
Cores88
Frequency4.1 GHz★3.8 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB★—
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★AMD Radeon 780M
GPU Benchmark Score
28,703
5,939
Typediscreteintegrated★
VRAM12 GB★—
VRAM TypeGDDR7Shared
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB★16 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDNVMe SSD★
Build
Form Factormid-towermini
PSU850W★54W
Weight14.50 kg—
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2★1
USB Ports8★6
Thunderbolt0USB4 40Gbps Type-C
HDMI1 x HDMIHDMI 2.1
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPortDP2.0
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E★
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3★Bluetooth 5.2
EthernetGigabit Ethernet2.5Gbps RJ45 wired LAN
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Pro

Prós e Contras

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

ACEMAGIC Retro X3

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong port selection (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong cpu (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong storage (74th percentile)
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile

Veredito

★ Vencedor: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Melhor em:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

ACEMAGIC Retro X3 Melhor em:

Compact