Netac
Netac
58 종합 점수
vs
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)
Kingstone
29 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
사양
| Netac | Kingstone | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4★ | DDR3 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 240 |
| Rank | — | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16 | 11★ |
| Timings | — | 11-11-11 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858★ | 1.5 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
장단점
Netac
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong affordability (79th percentile)
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)
- Strong affordability (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
가격
Netac0.822달러당 점수
vs
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)0.508달러당 점수
Netac 1.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Netac
Scores 58 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 16 specs.
