Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
Crucial
69 종합 점수
vs
Kingston KCP3L16ND8/8
Kingston
30 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
사양
| Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A | Kingston KCP3L16ND8/8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4★ | DDR3 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 240 |
| Rank | 2Rx8 | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 22 | 11★ |
| Timings | 22-22-22 | — |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | — |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✗ |
장단점
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
Kingston KCP3L16ND8/8
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
- Below average social proof (31st percentile)
가격
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A0.112달러당 점수
vs
Kingston KCP3L16ND8/80.450달러당 점수
Kingston KCP3L16ND8/8 4.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
Scores 69 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.
