Kingston ValueRAM
Kingston
57 종합 점수
vs
Timetec 75TT
Timetec
39 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Kingston ValueRAM | Timetec 75TT | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR3 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 240 |
| Rank | Single-rank | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 52 | 11★ |
| Timings | 52-52-52 | — |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | INTEL XMP | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✗ |
장단점
Kingston ValueRAM
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (65th percentile)
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
- Below average latency (26th percentile)
Timetec 75TT
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
가격
Kingston ValueRAM0.338달러당 점수
vs
Timetec 75TT2.146달러당 점수
Timetec 75TT 6.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Kingston ValueRAM
Scores 57 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
