Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
Team Group
84 종합 점수
vs
Kingston FURY Beast
Kingston
67 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Team Group | Kingston FURY Beast | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 262 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 32★ | 36 |
| Timings | 32-39-39-84 | — |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.100000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
장단점
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Below average affordability (24th percentile)
Kingston FURY Beast
- Strong speed (78th percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Strong latency (71st percentile)
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
- Below average affordability (28th percentile)
가격
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
Kingston FURY Beast
No current pricing available
결론
승자: Team Group
Scores 84 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
