PUSKILL
PUSKILL
61 종합 점수
vs
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B
Crucial
86 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| PUSKILL | Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16★ | 38 |
| Timings | 16-18-18-42 | 38-40-40-84 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
PUSKILL
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (77th percentile)
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
가격
PUSKILL0.387달러당 점수
vs
Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B0.164달러당 점수
PUSKILL 2.4배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Crucial CP2K16G64C38U5B
Scores 86 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 15 specs.
