PUSKILL
PUSKILL
66 종합 점수
vs
Kingston FURY Beast
Kingston
91 종합 점수
점수
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Server
사양
| PUSKILL | Kingston FURY Beast | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | — | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16★ | 30 |
| Timings | 16-18-18-42 | 30-36-36 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858★ | 1.399999976158142 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
PUSKILL
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
Kingston FURY Beast
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong speed (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
가격
PUSKILL
No current pricing available
Kingston FURY Beast
결론
승자: Kingston FURY Beast
Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.
