Netac Shadow III 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White
Netac
67 종합 점수
vs
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
Team Group
89 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Netac Shadow III | Team Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | — | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16★ | 32 |
| Timings | — | 32-39-39-84 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | Intel XMP 3.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Netac Shadow III 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average affordability (23rd percentile)
가격
Netac Shadow III 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White0.334달러당 점수
vs
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)0.152달러당 점수
Netac Shadow III 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 White 2.2배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Team Group
Scores 89 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 2 of 16 specs.
