OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO
OM System
85 종합 점수
vs
Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm
Sigma
49 종합 점수
점수
Landscape
Video Cinema
Budget
Professional
Macro
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Street
Portrait
사양
| OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO | Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 12 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 100 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 17 | — |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 5★ | — |
| Coating | Z Coating Nano | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | — |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.56 kg★ | 0.62 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 150 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 0.3x★ | — |
장단점
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong build (68th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (77th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (75th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
가격
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO
Sigma Contemporary 887965 16-300mm
결론
승자: OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO
Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.
