FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
FotoZ
72 종합 점수
vs
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
Vivitar
35 종합 점수
점수
Macro
Street
Budget
Travel
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
사양
| FotoZ KZ-03 24mm | Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 55 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 24 mm | 55 mm |
| Coating | nano-coatings | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | 55mm |
| Weight | 0.12 kg★ | 0.14 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 16 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 10X★ | — |
장단점
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
- Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong versatility (68th percentile)
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
- Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong aperture (66th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
가격
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm1.646달러당 점수
vs
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm1.429달러당 점수
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm 1.2배 더 나은 가성비
FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
결론
승자: FotoZ KZ-03 24mm
Scores 72 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 11 specs.
