AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME
AMD
40 종합 점수
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 종합 점수
점수
Productivity
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
Ai Llm
Server
사양
| AMD EPYC 7532 | MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | — |
| Series | EPYC | — |
| Model | 7532 | — |
| Codename | Rome | — |
| Class | server | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 32★ | — |
| Base Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Boost Clock | 데이터 없음 | |
| Cache | ||
| L3 Cache | 데이터 없음 | |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | 데이터 없음 | |
| PassMark Single | 데이터 없음 | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4★ | — |
| Max Speed | 데이터 없음 | |
| Channels | 8★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | EPYC ROME | — |
| PCIe | 4.0 | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 데이터 없음 | |
| TDP | 200★ | — |
장단점
AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME
- Strong platform (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (77th percentile)
- Below average social proof (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average affordability (26th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (26th percentile)
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
가격
AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME0.120달러당 점수
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.057달러당 점수
AMD EPYC 7532 32-core EPYC ROME 2.1배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Scores 66 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 18 specs.
