Sirui Venus E35 35mm
Sirui
28 総合スコア
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Tamron
97 総合スコア
スコア
Video Cinema
Budget
Macro
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
スペック
| Sirui Venus E35 35mm | Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 70 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.9 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 1.36 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | RXD |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 35 mm★ | 190 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4.8★ |
長所と短所
Sirui Venus E35 35mm
- Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average build (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
価格
Sirui Venus E35 35mm0.053ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm0.156ドルあたりのスコア
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm 2.9倍のコストパフォーマンス
Sirui Venus E35 35mm
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
結論
勝者: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
