XFX Radeon RX 7600 Speedster 8GB GDDR6
XFX
49 総合スコア
vs
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SOLID SFF OC 16GB GDDR7
ZOTAC
91 総合スコア
スコア
Ray Tracing
Content Creation
Gaming 4k
Gaming 1440p
Gaming 1080p
Budget
Workstation
Ai Llm
スペック
| XFX Radeon RX 7600 Speedster | ZOTAC GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SOLID SFF OC | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Radeon RX 7600 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
| Brand | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | RDNA 3 | Blackwell |
| Class | consumer | consumer |
| Process | 6 | 5★ |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 8 GB | 16 GB★ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7★ |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| Compute | ||
| CUDA Cores | データなし | |
| Tensor Cores | ||
| RT Cores | 32 | 70★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 43.5 | 43.939998626708984★ |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 21.75 | 43.939998626708984★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 165★ | 300 |
| Recommended PSU | 450★ | 750 |
| Power Connectors | — | 1 x 16-Pin |
| Cooler | Dual Fan | Triple Fan★ |
| Fans | 2 | 3★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | DisplayPort, HDMI | PCI Express 5.0 x16 |
| DisplayPort | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | 1 | 1 |
| Max Displays | — | 4★ |
| Max Resolution | 3820 x 2160 | 7680 x 4320 |
| Physical | ||
| Length | 360 | 304★ |
| Slot Width | 2 | 2 |
| Form Factor | — | ATX |
| Weight | 2.00 kg | 1.70 kg★ |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Upscaling | — | DLSS 4 |
| AV1 Encode | — | ✓★ |
| VR Ready | — | ✓★ |
| DirectX | — | 12 Ultimate |
| RGB | — | ✓★ |
長所と短所
XFX Radeon RX 7600 Speedster 8GB GDDR6
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SOLID SFF OC 16GB GDDR7
- Strong feature (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong compute (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong rt (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
価格
XFX Radeon RX 7600 Speedster 8GB GDDR60.135ドルあたりのスコア
vs
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SOLID SFF OC 16GB GDDR70.071ドルあたりのスコア
XFX Radeon RX 7600 Speedster 8GB GDDR6 1.9倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: ZOTAC GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SOLID SFF OC
Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 21 of 38 specs.
