ASUS PG27AQDP
ASUS
86 Punteggio complessivo
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
MSI
95 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Office
Professional
Creative
Gaming
Entertainment
Portable
Specifiche
| ASUS PG27AQDP | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | OLED | QD-OLED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 480 Hz★ | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 1300 nits★ | 1000 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 10-bit | 10-bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 3★ | 1 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 27W★ | — |
| Weight | 6.21 kg★ | 8.00 kg |
Pro e Contro
ASUS PG27AQDP
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong color (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average user sentiment (28th percentile)
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
Prezzi
ASUS PG27AQDP0.088punteggio per dollaro
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 20260.155punteggio per dollaro
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.8x migliore
ASUS PG27AQDP
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
Verdetto
Vincitore: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"
Scores 95 overall, wins 0 of 6 usage categories and 1 of 28 specs.
