Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm

Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm

Sony
68 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Professional
Sigma
86
Sony
77
Street
Sigma
86
Sony
65
Landscape
Sigma
71
Sony
82
Macro
Sigma
82
Sony
61
Portrait
Sigma
81
Sony
56
Travel
Sigma
80
Sony
68
Budget
Sigma
75
Sony
78
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Sony
74
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Sony
71

Specifiche

Sigma 207975Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomzoom
Focal Length Min10 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm35 mm
Elements1315
Groups1012
Aspherical Elements15
ED Elements42
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades711
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.68 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusXD Linear Motors
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm280 mm
Max Magnification1:40.32x

Pro e Contro

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Prezzi

Sigma 207975 is 1.112 £ cheaper (2.7x less).

Sigma 2079750.133punteggio per dollaro
vs
Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm0.039punteggio per dollaro

Sigma 207975 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 3.4x migliore

Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm

Verdetto

Vincitore: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Migliore per:

MacroStreetTravelPortraitProfessional

Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm Migliore per:

BudgetLandscapeWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche