Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6 Black
Someone running legacy multi-monitor setups or old workstation software that needs a cheap, low-power card with specific driver support, not for gaming or modern workloads.
Budget gamers who want solid 1080p performance and don't mind turning down settings at higher resolutions, this card delivers great value for around $250.
मुख्य अंतर
- VRAM is the killer here: 8GB on the ASRock versus 2GB on the Lenovo. Modern games barely run on 2GB, and even basic video editing will choke.
- The ASRock scores 16,551 on PassMark G3D while the Lenovo manages 677. That's not a typo. The RX 7600 is roughly 24x faster in real-world graphics workloads.
- Power draw tells the story: 165W TDP on the ASRock versus 35W on the Lenovo. The Lenovo sips power because it's barely doing anything, not because it's efficient.
- The Lenovo has a 384-bit memory bus and 504 GB/s bandwidth, which sounds impressive until you realize it's feeding a GPU with 2GB of VRAM and no modern feature support.
- Customer sentiment backs this up: ASRock owners rate it 4.6/5 with praise for 1080p performance and thermals, while the Lenovo's 4.1/5 comes from people using it as a basic display adapter, not a performance card.
खरीदार क्या कहते हैं
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
अभी तक कोई ग्राहक फीडबैक नहीं
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6 Black
ASRock RX 7600 Challenger 8GB को 1080p पर ठोस प्रदर्शन, अच्छी थर्मल और आसान RGB सॉफ्टवेयर के लिए अच्छी प्रतिक्रिया मिली है। उपयोगकर्ता बजट बिल्ड के लिए इसकी कीमत का मूल्य सराहते हैं, हालांकि कुछ ध्यान देते हैं कि 8GB VRAM और रे ट्रेसिंग उच्च रिज़ॉल्यूशन के लिए सीमित हैं। कुछ ड्राइवर अस्थिरता और ASRock से समर्थन की कमी का उल्लेख करते हैं।
खूबियाँ
- 1080p पर ठोस प्रदर्शन
- लोड पर अच्छी थर्मल
- आसान RGB सॉफ्टवेयर
- बजट बिल्ड के लिए अच्छा मूल्य
- ऊर्जा कुशल
कमियाँ
- 1440p पर 8GB VRAM सीमित
- रे ट्रेसिंग प्रदर्शन औसत
- अपडेट के बाद ड्राइवर अस्थिरता
- ASRock समर्थन की कमी
स्कोर
स्पेसिफिकेशन
| Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 | ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Quadro NVS 510 | Radeon RX 7600 |
| Brand | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3 |
| Class | workstation | consumer |
| Process | 5★ | 6 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 2 GB | 8 GB★ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| Compute | ||
| Stream Processors | डेटा उपलब्ध नहीं | |
| Tensor Cores | — | 64★ |
| RT Cores | 54★ | 32 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 55.29999923706055★ | 43.5 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 27.649999618530273★ | 21.75 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 35★ | 165 |
| Recommended PSU | 450★ | 550 |
| Power Connectors | — | 8-Pin |
| Cooler | Fan | Dual Fan★ |
| Fans | — | 2★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | — | PCI Express 4.0 x8 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 3★ |
| HDMI | — | 1★ |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
| Max Resolution | — | 7680 x 4320 |
| Physical | ||
| Length | — | 269★ |
| Slot Width | — | 2★ |
| Form Factor | Low Profile | ATX |
| Weight | 0.10 kg★ | 0.64 kg |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✗ | ✓★ |
| AV1 Encode | — | ✓★ |
| DirectX | — | 12 Ultimate |
| RGB | — | ✓★ |
फायदे और नुकसान
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Strong compute (66th percentile)
- Below average raster (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average feature (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average efficiency (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average vram (15th percentile)15th %ile
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6 Black
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong affordability (75th percentile)
- Strong connectivity (71st percentile)
कीमतें
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation 2.4x बेहतर वैल्यू फॉर मनी
फैसला
Scores 55 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 16 of 36 specs.
