Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)

Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)

Team Group
84 Score global
vs
Corsair (CMP32GX5M2B6000C30W)

Corsair (CMP32GX5M2B6000C30W)

Corsair
86 Score global

Scores

Gaming
Team Group
90
Corsair
94
Workstation
Team Group
84
Corsair
89
Budget
Team Group
87
Corsair
88
Laptop
Team Group
61
Corsair
64
Server
Team Group
37
Corsair
40

Spécifications

Team GroupCorsair
Memory
TypeDDR5DDR5
Form FactorUDIMMUDIMM
Total Capacity
32,768
32,768
Modules22
Per Module
16,384
16,384
Pins288288
Rank1Rx8—
Performance
Speed
6,400
6,000
CAS Latency3230★
Timings32-39-39-8430-36-36-76
Voltage1.350000023841858★1.399999976158142
Class
ECC✗✗
Registered✗✗
OC ProfileIntel XMP 3.0Intel XMP 3.0
Features
RGB✗✓★
Heat Spreader✓✓

Avantages & Inconvénients

Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)

  • Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong feature (75th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (24th percentile)

Corsair (CMP32GX5M2B6000C30W)

  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong speed (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average affordability (18th percentile)18th %ile

Prix

Both products are similarly priced.

Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)

Corsair (CMP32GX5M2B6000C30W)

Verdict

═ Égalité

Both products are closely matched - Team Group wins 2 specs while Corsair wins 2.

Corsair Meilleur pour:

GamingLaptopServerWorkstation

A considérer aussi