Tamron Di III-A RXD 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD
Tamron
77 Score global
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
98 Score global
Scores
Landscape
Budget
Macro
Travel
Video Cinema
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Street
Spécifications
| Tamron Di III-A RXD 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 11 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 20 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 12 | 20 |
| Groups | 10 | 14 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 5★ |
| Coating | BBAR-G2 | water- and oil-repellent coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 3.5-6.7 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.19 kg | 0.61 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | RXD (Rapid eXtra Silent Stepping Drive) | HLA |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 150 mm★ | 170 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:4 | 1:2 |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Tamron Di III-A RXD 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD
- Strong macro (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average build (24th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
Prix
Tamron Di III-A RXD 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD0.126score par dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.164score par dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.3x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
