Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

Carl Zeiss
42 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
77 Score global

Scores

Macro
Carl Zeiss
20
Nikon
82
Budget
Carl Zeiss
47
Nikon
78
Video Cinema
Carl Zeiss
40
Nikon
75
Portrait
Carl Zeiss
51
Nikon
73
Professional
Carl Zeiss
34
Nikon
69
Street
Carl Zeiss
48
Nikon
67
Landscape
Carl Zeiss
23
Nikon
62
Wildlife Sports
Carl Zeiss
34
Nikon
55
Travel
Carl Zeiss
29
Nikon
55

Spécifications

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min18 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm35 mm
Elements—17
Groups—12
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—2★
Coating—Nano Crystal Coat
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/4
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4
Constant—✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
Mount—Nikon F
Format—full-frame★
Weight0.33 kg★0.68 kg
Filter Thread—77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Silent Wave Motor
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—2.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—290 mm★
Max Magnification—1:4★

Avantages & Inconvénients

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong macro (74th percentile)

Prix

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691 is 300 £GB cheaper (1.4x less).

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-6910.053score par dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR0.070score par dollar

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.3x meilleur

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Verdict

★ Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Scores 77 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi