TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm

TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm

TTArtisan
80 Score global
vs
Ulanzi 2229

Ulanzi 2229

Ulanzi
63 Score global

Scores

Portrait
TTArtisan
98
Ulanzi
60
Street
TTArtisan
94
Ulanzi
52
Macro
TTArtisan
71
Ulanzi
80
Budget
TTArtisan
79
Ulanzi
58
Video Cinema
TTArtisan
78
Ulanzi
46
Professional
TTArtisan
71
Ulanzi
47
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
70
Ulanzi
41
Travel
TTArtisan
62
Ulanzi
34
Landscape
TTArtisan
55
Ulanzi
44

Spécifications

TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mmUlanzi 2229
Optics
Typestandardwide-angle
Focal Length Min35 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm18 mm
Elements10
Groups7
ED Elements21
Coating30-Layer Nano-Coating Double-Side
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.8
Min Aperturef/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountFujifilm Xsony
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.18 kg
Filter Thread52 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM and lead screw-type stepping motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance400 mm18 mm
Max Magnification10X

Avantages & Inconvénients

TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Ulanzi 2229

  • Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Prix

Ulanzi 2229 is 141 £GB cheaper (4.0x less).

TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm0.426score par dollar
vs
Ulanzi 22291.366score par dollar

Ulanzi 2229 offre un rapport qualité-prix 3.2x meilleur

TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm

Verdict

Gagnant: TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm

Scores 80 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.

TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.8 Mark II 35mm Meilleur pour:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Ulanzi 2229 Meilleur pour:

Macro

A considérer aussi