Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
Sony
89 Score global
vs
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm
TTArtisan
57 Score global
Scores
Travel
Budget
Street
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Portrait
Professional
Macro
Spécifications
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm | TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 27 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 27 mm |
| Elements | 9 | — |
| Groups | 8 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/27 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 0.20 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 27 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x★ | — |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm
- Strong macro (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Prix
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm0.662score par dollar
vs
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm0.338score par dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.0x meilleur
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
TTArtisan APS-C AF 27mm f2.8 Frame 27mm
Verdict
Gagnant: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
