Crucial (CT2K32G4DFD832A)
Crucial
68 Puntuación general
vs
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)
Kingstone
29 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
Especificaciones
| Crucial | Kingstone | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4★ | DDR3 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 240 |
| Rank | 2Rx8 | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 22 | 11★ |
| Timings | 22-22-22 | 11-11-11 |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | 1.5 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✗ |
Pros y Contras
Crucial (CT2K32G4DFD832A)
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
- Strong feature (65th percentile)
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)
- Strong affordability (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Precios
Crucial (CT2K32G4DFD832A)0.112puntos por dólar
vs
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)0.508puntos por dólar
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8) ofrece 4.5x mejor relación calidad-precio
Veredicto
Ganador: Crucial
Scores 68 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.
