Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

Tamron
71 Puntuación general
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
84 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Landscape
Tamron
69
Sigma
90
Macro
Tamron
55
Sigma
85
Budget
Tamron
79
Sigma
84
Travel
Tamron
73
Sigma
78
Professional
Tamron
61
Sigma
74
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
64
Sigma
72
Video Cinema
Tamron
55
Sigma
71
Portrait
Tamron
63
Sigma
69
Street
Tamron
60
Sigma
67

Especificaciones

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXDSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min70 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm300 mm
Elements1520
Groups1014
Aspherical Elements04★
ED Elements15★
CoatingBBAR (Broad-Band Anti-Reflection) CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4.5f/6.7
Min Aperture4.5-6.33.5-6.7
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.55 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeRXDHLA (High-response Linear Actuator)
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance800 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification1:5.11:2

Pros y Contras

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

  • Strong versatility (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Strong build (67th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (76th percentile)

Precios

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

No current pricing available

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Veredicto

★ Ganador: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 84 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Mejor en:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

También considerar