ASUS ROG RYUO IV SLC 360 ARGB 2025
ASUS
16 Puntuación general
vs
MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US Black 2025
MSI
81 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Home Office
Gaming
Business
Workstation
Developer
Creator
Ai Llm
Compact
Especificaciones
| ASUS ROG RYUO IV SLC 360 ARGB | MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | — | AMD Ryzen 7 8700F★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Sin datos | |
| Cores | — | 8★ |
| Frequency | — | 4.1 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 16 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | — | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Sin datos | |
| Type | — | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 8 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | — | 16 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | — | DDR5★ |
| Storage 1 | — | 2 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | — | NVMe SSD★ |
| Build | ||
| Form Factor | aio | mid-tower |
| PSU | 120W | 650W★ |
| Weight | 3.67 kg | 9.70 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 1★ |
| USB Ports | — | 8★ |
| HDMI | — | 1 x HDMI 2.1 |
| DisplayPort | — | 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | — | Gigabit Ethernet |
| System | ||
| OS | — | Windows 11 Home |
Pros y Contras
ASUS ROG RYUO IV SLC 360 ARGB 2025
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average storage (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average port selection (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average ram (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average gpu (10th percentile)10th %ile
MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US Black 2025
- Strong storage (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong port selection (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong gpu (73rd percentile)
Precios
ASUS ROG RYUO IV SLC 360 ARGB 20250.034puntos por dólar
vs
MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US Black 20250.051puntos por dólar
MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US Black 2025 ofrece 1.5x mejor relación calidad-precio
ASUS ROG RYUO IV SLC 360 ARGB 2025
MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US Black 2025
Veredicto
Ganador: MSI Codex Z2 A8NVL-484US
Scores 81 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 17 of 25 specs.
