CP31M

CP31M

ICONLINK
41 Overall Score
vs
UMIDIGI Active T1

UMIDIGI Active T1

UMIDIGI
68 Overall Score

Scores

Art Design
ICONLINK
30
UMIDIGI
64
Reading
ICONLINK
44
UMIDIGI
61
Business
ICONLINK
31
UMIDIGI
60
Entertainment
ICONLINK
41
UMIDIGI
59
Student
ICONLINK
37
UMIDIGI
59
Productivity
ICONLINK
24
UMIDIGI
57

Specifications

CP31MUMIDIGI Active T1
Processor
CPUUnisoc2000 MHz
Cores48
Memory & Storage
RAM4 GB16 GB
Storage128 GB128 GB
Expandable
Display
Size10.1"11"
PanelIPS
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0
USB-C11
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Fingerprint Reader
Face Unlock
IP RatingIP68 & IP69K
Physical
Weight0.97 kg0.76 kg
OSAndroid 15Android

Pros & Cons

CP31M

  • Below average ram (31st percentile)
  • Below average feature (33rd percentile)

UMIDIGI Active T1

  • Strong user sentiment (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong ram (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average screen (29th percentile)

Pricing

CP31M is £80 cheaper (2.0x less).

CP31M0.507score per dollar
vs
UMIDIGI Active T10.426score per dollar

CP31M offers 1.2x better value for money

UMIDIGI Active T1

Verdict

Winner: UMIDIGI Active T1

Scores 68 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 17 specs.

UMIDIGI Active T1 Better at:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment

Also Consider