Team Group T-FORCE G50

Team Group T-FORCE G50

Team Group
66 Overall Score
vs
Crucial T700

Crucial T700

Crucial
79 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Team Group T-FORCE G50

82 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

This SSD is generally well-received, with users praising its speed, value, and performance in NAS and gaming setups. Some minor drawbacks include the need to manually attach heatsinks and the presence of a status LED that some find unnecessary. Overall, it's seen as a solid, affordable choice for everyday users and enthusiasts alike.

Pros
  • Fast read/write speeds
  • Good value for money
  • Works well in NAS
  • Easy installation
  • Reliable performance
Cons
  • Manual heatsink attachment
  • Unnecessary status LED
  • Not top-tier speed
👍 Speed 4
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Ease of installation 2
🤔 Build quality 2
🤔 Thermal management 2
👎 Led indicator 1

Crucial T700

82 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The Crucial T700 Gen5 NVMe SSD is widely praised for its blazing sequential speeds, often exceeding specs, and its effective heatsink design. However, users note that random performance gains over Gen4 are minimal, and the large heatsink can complicate installation and limit expansion options. Overall, it's a top-tier choice for those wanting maximum performance, but it requires careful consideration of physical fit and airflow.

Pros
  • Blazing sequential speeds
  • Effective heatsink design
  • Exceeds advertised speeds
  • Sturdy build quality
  • Good value for performance
Cons
  • Large heatsink size
  • Minimal random performance gains
  • Complicates installation
  • Limits expansion options
  • Requires adequate airflow
👍 Sequential speed 6
👍 Heatsink design 5
🤔 Random performance 3
👎 Installation difficulty 4
👍 Value for money 2
👍 Build quality 2

Scores

Workstation
Team Group
60
Crucial
82
Gaming
Team Group
51
Crucial
76
Console
Team Group
42
Crucial
74
Budget
Team Group
65
Crucial
67
Laptop
Team Group
57
Crucial
66
Portable
Team Group
16
Crucial
19

Specifications

Team Group T-FORCE G50Crucial T700
Drive
Capacity
512
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation45★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
5,000
11,700
Sequential Write (MB/s)
2,500
9,500
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,350,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,400,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✓★
ControllerInnoGritPhison E26
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
325
600
MTBF (hours)
3,000,000
No data
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✓✓

Pros & Cons

Team Group T-FORCE G50

  • Strong endurance (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Strong speed (65th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (34th percentile)

Crucial T700

  • Strong feature (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong speed (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Crucial T700

Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 17 specs.

Crucial T700 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation