Team Group MS30 256GB SATA III M.2 2280

Team Group MS30 256GB SATA III M.2 2280

Team Group
32 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Team Group MS30 256GB SATA III M.2 2280

38 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews

This budget M.2 SATA SSD receives mixed reviews. While some users find it a cheap and simple upgrade for basic tasks, many report serious reliability issues, including random freezes, slowdowns, and signs of failure within a month. The lack of DRAM cache and low endurance are common concerns, and several reviewers advise spending more on a reputable brand like Samsung.

Pros
  • Cheap price
  • Simple upgrade for basic tasks
  • Works as portable USB drive
  • Compatible with some systems
Cons
  • No DRAM cache
  • Low endurance (60TBW)
  • Random freezes and slowdowns
  • Signs of failure within a month
  • Not recommended for heavy workloads
👎 Reliability 4
🤔 Performance 4
🤔 Value for money 3
👎 Dram cache 3
🤔 Compatibility 3
👎 Endurance 2

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This SSD is praised for its exceptional durability and high endurance, with a 5-year warranty and Rescue Services adding peace of mind. Users highlight its blazing-fast sequential read and write speeds, which are ideal for gaming and heavy workloads. The support for DirectStorage is a plus for modern gaming setups. However, some users note that compatibility with all computers may not be guaranteed, so checking system requirements is advised.

Pros
  • 5-year warranty
  • Rescue Services included
  • High endurance (5,050TBW)
  • Fast sequential read/write
  • DirectStorage support
Cons
  • Compatibility not guaranteed
  • May not fit all computers
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

Scores

Laptop
Team Group
40
Seagate
91
Gaming
Team Group
21
Seagate
86
Console
Team Group
10
Seagate
84
Workstation
Team Group
34
Seagate
83
Budget
Team Group
76
Seagate
73
Portable
Team Group
8
Seagate
24

Specifications

Team Group MS30Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
256
4,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—4★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
500
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
400
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllerPhison S11E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
128
5,050
MTBF (hours)
1,500,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✗✗

Pros & Cons

Team Group MS30 256GB SATA III M.2 2280

  • Strong affordability (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong endurance (77th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average speed (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average capacity (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 17 specs.

Team Group MS30 Better at:

Budget

Seagate FireCuda 530R Better at:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation